Re-Re-Thinking The Trunk Gun.

tumblr_o0ty0lJ2F11sby66go7_500

You’re not going to use your trunk gun to shoot a terrorist in the face. You’re just not. You job is to be your own FIRST responder, not a second responder like the cop who arrives after the shooting starts. Greg Ellifritz makes a really good point on the Ballistic Radio show from a few weeks ago: When the cops roll up on the scene, they are going to be looking for guys with rifles.

You’re on the scene. You have a rifle in your hands. It’s not going to go well for you.

However, that doesn’t mean that a trunk gun is totally useless. You spend a third of your life at work, and trouble can happen right quickly when you’re away from home. If you have to defend your life at work (and maybe the lives of your coworkers), you’ll probably want more than a pistol (if you have one) or a stapler (if you don’t). Turning your home into Warwick Castle means diddley-squat if you’re attacked out side of your ancestral manse.

Is This Derp Really Necessary?

This greeted me when I checked Facebook on Saturday morning. This is a conversation from a FB group for the small community in the midst of the Florida Everglades where I live. MAFA is a martial arts dojo near me which specialize in the usual things that strip mall martial arts studios specialize in, except they teach Krav Maga instead of a variant form of karate or taekwondo.

Ummmn, ok… blank ammo used in what was obviously an “Active Shooter Defense For Dummies” class? Now, I had a post written, already to go, about how using blanks in a training class, for any reason, is a bad idea.

But then I stopped by the dojo on Monday and talked with one of the trainers about how they used blanks and why, and it changed my mind. They used the blanks outside to do what blanks are meant to do: Simulate the sound of gunfire as realistically as possible. They shot the blanks off outside so the people inside the dojo could a) understand what gunfire (sorta) sounds like and b) get used to localizing the sound of gunfire and reacting accordingly.

Ok, I can dig that. There were a lot of people in that class who had never heard what rapid gun shots sound like, so in this case, it did some good. Now, we can debate the usefulness of active shooter classes at another time. I’m not really a fan because they teach a limited skill set that is useful only in (very) rarely occuriring situations, but hey, a dojo’s gotta keep the doors open and the lights on, and if the Sig Academy teaches similar, who are we to judge?

I wouldn’t do teach such a class and I don’t think I’d go to a class that teaches such things, but that doesn’t mean it was dangerous or ill-advised. If it gets people pointed towards other instructors who know what they’re doing, then it’s a good thing.

 

Open Carry That Worked Really, Really Well.

The breathless pearl-clutching in this NPR article is somewhat funny to read, now that the Republican National Convention is over and pretty much nothing happened outside the venues.

With the country reeling after shootings of police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge, La., the issue of open carry in Cleveland has become a flashpoint. The head of Cleveland’s largest police union called on Gov. John Kasich to suspend open carry for the duration of convention.

“I don’t care if it’s constitutional or not at this point,” Stephen Loomis, president of Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Association, told CNN.

In a news conference today, Mayor Frank Jackson said the idea had been taken up and down the chain of command and Kasich said he did not have the authority to change state law.

That means that people have been walking around downtown Cleveland with their firearms.

Allen said he decided to bring his handgun after the police shootings in Dallas. He said someone intent on carrying out something similar would be dissuaded by the show of force.

Kudos to everyone who was legally carrying a gun in Cleveland last week (open carry or not).

Anyone want to bet that the Democrat convention in Philadelphia (not exactly the most gun-friendly city in the U.S.) won’t have the same calmness surrounding it that the Republicans (and their guns) had?

Setting The Narrative.

You see what you expect to seeBreach, Bang and Clear posted a photo from the North Miami police department on a recent police-involved shooting that went really, really wrong.

The police shooting of an African-American caregiver, who was lying in the street trying to help an autism patient, was accidental, according to the local police union representing the North Miami officer.

The officer had intended to shoot the patient, whom he thought posed a danger, but accidentally shot the caregiver instead, said John Rivera, the President of the Dade County Police Benevolent Association.

Now, the question is, why did the cops roll in there thinking that there was a danger of someone getting shot? Because the dispatcher told them there was a man with a gun on-scene threatening suicide.

Turns out it was a toy truck.

There are lots and lots of things to talk about here regarding police training and use-of-force, but I’m going to let others talk about such things. My takeaway from this is different: Because of the bad information that was sent to the dispatchers from the calling in the incident, the cops rolled up expecting to see certain things, and reacted as if those things were occurring, even though they weren’t.

Still think you shouldn’t call the cops and be the one to set the narrative in their minds after a defensive gun use?

I don’t. The first narrative is always, always the one that tends to stick. The sooner you get your story out in front of law enforcement (under the guidance of a lawyer, of course), the better off you’ll be.

What We See As Defensive, They See As Offensive.

image

I’m not 100% certain in my thinking here, so please pardon me as I write this stuff down in an attempt to clarify things in my own brain, and then, perhaps, maybe yours as well.

Hey, when they said blogging is “intellectual prototyping”, they weren’t kidding!

That quote from Col. Cooper got me thinking: I have never once thought of my guns as a means to acquire something. Instead, I agree 100% with Maj. L Cauldill Marko Kloos: I don’t carry a gun to impose my will on others, I carry so others cannot illegally enforce their will on me.

I see the gun, especially the handgun, as a civilizing force, as a means to achieve reason. The reality is, though, that the vast majority of illegal deaths caused by firearms are committed with handguns. What I use as a civilizing force, others use in an extremely uncivilizing manner.

Same gun, different results.

That means something, and I’m not sure what. It’s a loose thread in the sweater of my rational mind, and I’m sure to be picking at it some more as the weeks go by.

What Makes A Civilian Defender When Everyone Has Guns?

Golindrianas ladyConsistency and the ability to make the shot on-demand, that’s what. Consider this quote from an article which asks the question, “What makes a photographer when everyone is taking pictures?”.

“If you were there when the Hindenburg caught on fire, and you took a picture of it, that’s a great photograph. But you’re not a great photographer, because you can’t repeat that in everyday things,” he continues. “What a great photographer does is, they are consistently able to make something in a style that’s personal to themselves.”

Been there, done that, have the contact sheets to prove it. For the best (photo) shot I’ve taken, I had time to snap exactly one frame (that’s the image to the right). It was on a medical mission trip to a small town in the coastal jungles of Ecuador, and I was along to document the trip. The lady in the picture was waiting for her turn to see the doctor, and I had to be very circumspect with my photos. I rounded a corner, saw her, saw the light, ducked back around the corner, set my camera for the exposure I wanted and pre-set the focus for the estimated distance from me to her, turned back around the corner, framed the shot, fine-tuned the focus and snapped the shot. If I had taken more than one shot or filled with my camera in front of her, I wouldn’t have gotten the same expression, and it’s wouldn’t have been as strong of a photo.

The whole thing took far, far less time to do than for me to write about it up there. Think there’s a corollary here with personal defense? I do.

I knew my camera (a Nikon FG with an 105mm f2.5 lens), I knew my film (Fujichrome 100), I knew lighting, I knew the rules of composition and, most importantly, I didn’t have to stop and consider what options would be best at the moment the shot presented itself. I knew there was enough light coming in from the left side window to expose her face, I knew there was enough light coming in from the right to separate her out from the background, and I knew there’d be enough light from the window that the picture would be sharp at 1/125 at f.28. Keep in mind this was pre-digital: If you’re not ± one stop exposure on chromes, you’re toast, and so my ISO was 100, period. No cheating by cranking up to ISO12800 with the turn of a wheel, and no chimping, either.

That’s what a civilian defender does. They may have the same gear as a dilletante, they may talk about the same things as a dilettante, but when push comes to shove and they see the shot, they take it, and they take it in confidence.

Sell To The Person Behind The Gun, Not The Gun Itself.

Joshua Clafin of Garrison Everest brings up a great point here: Firearms companies SUCK at personalization of their marketing messages.

Your brand likely has a 5–20 percent chance of selling to a new prospect versus 60–70 percent for an existing consumer. Compound that with the fact that, on average, 55 percent of marketing budgets are spent on new customer acquisition, and it’s no surprise that increasing loyalty among existing users can reduce costs by as much as 10 percent. (Source: 5OneMedia)

Building a mutually beneficial relationship with your customer should be a priority that will increase profits. Why don’t most marketers engage in personalization? I think most don’t know where to start and for others it’s about getting over the hurdle of understanding who their customer is.

He mentions the amazing lack of social media savvy displayed by firearms companies, but there’s a older, more basic (and more profitable) opportunity for personalization that gun companies are choosing to ignore: Personalized, triggered emails.

I signed up for Gander Mountain’s emails awhile ago because I wanted to see how they were using the personalization features built into Bronto, their email system of choice.

Short answer, they weren’t. Bronto allows for different email messages to be sent based on customer actions. If a customer opens up an email and clicks on link, you can adjust the content of future emails based on their actions on your site, allowing for personalization and increased engagement (and more revenue). To test their setup, I signed up with one email account and didn’t do anything with the emails I received, while in another account, I opened emails and clicked away, even buying a few items to see what might happen.

Nothing changed. I got the same emails in both accounts, no matter what my activity was. Look, eBay and a bunch of other companies understand that a tighter relationship with the customer equals more revenue, why can’t the gun industry understand that as well?

France Calls For More First Responders.

Rocked with wave after wave of Methodist Presbyterian Huguenot youth of indeterminate origin violence, the French Interior Minister is appealing to the people of France to help prevent more attacks on French soil by becoming reserve police officers.

French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve on Saturday called on young citizens to become reservists and help boost security forces in the wake of the country’s latest terror attack.

France’s “operational reservists” include French citizens with or without military experience as well as former soldiers.

“I want to call on all French patriots who wish to do so, to join this operational reserve,” said Cazeneuve.

If only France had some organization out there to train civilians in the marksmanship needed to defend their country, and if only French citizens had to keep and bear arms in their own defence as well as the defence of their country.

If only… if only.

You are, and always have been, your own first responder. The cops don’t get there first, you do.