- Buying the gun is the cheap part. Feeding it is the expensive part.
- Accessory availability matters. I love my CZ’s, but there’s just not the range of add-ons for it as there is for a Glock or M&P.
- It’s okay to take a LOT of time before buying a gun.
- Spending $100 in ammo on a rental range saves you a lot more money in buyer’s remorse.
- Unless you’re a collector, never buy Generation 1 of any gun.
- When going to the range for the first time, go with someone who has been there before.
- Ask stupid questions. It avoids stupid mistakes.
- Gun store clerks know which guns make them money and which guns they like, but not necessarily the best gun for you.
- Buy enough gun to stop a threat, but also buy something you’ll enjoy shooting regularly. Defensive guns should not be set in a “In case of Emergency, Break Glass” case, but need to be practiced with on a regular basis.
- No one told me practical shooting was so much fun. I found out that for myself the first time I tried it.
I like Ron’s idea: What five things would you change about your favorite gun company. George Hill’s already talked about Sig, Ron’s talked about Smith and Wesson, and I’ve been tasked with talking about CZ.
I wonder why…
I’m just going to talk about their pistols, because a) that’s what George and Ron mostly talked about and b) I kinda like what CZ is doing with their shotguns and rifle lines right now.
Ok, so what five things would I change about CZ-UB/CZ-USA?
1. Get into the concealed carry market in the U.S. in a serious way
Czech citizens can get a permit to carry a firearm for personal defense MUCH easier than most of their European cousins, so you’d think that CZ would catch on to the idea that American civilians buy more guns than American policemen do.
And you’d be wrong. Their are two problems with carrying a CZ concealed: Width and weight. The width is because of their unique slide design and a wide CCW gun is an awkward CCW gun. The weight is because CZ likes big metal guns. I like big metal guns too, but they weigh more that plastic does, and even CZ’s polymer P07 weighs a third of a pound more than a Glock 19. A stack and a half polymer gun that holds about 9+1 rounds and is under an inch wide would fill this niche nicely.
2. Support the P07 with more aftermarket parts
I don’t have much of a problem with the P07′s 8+ pound double action trigger pull, but I’d LOVE to have factory parts to take that down a pound or more, along with more of the wiz-bang features that M+P and Glock owners have gotten used to. Speaking of which…
3. Realize there are other practical pistol sports besides IPSC and USPSA.
I shoot my P07 in IDPA, and it’s kinda like being the turd in the punchbowl in the world of CZ competition shooters. CZ was a sponsor of the IDPA Nationals and there are Dan Wesson 1911′s that are great for IDPA CDP and 3 Gun, but a little ESP love for IDPA would be muchly appreciated.
4. Work on reliability
This is your Achilles Heel. Whatever it takes, be it Six Sigma or whatever processes there are out there (Ron’s the procurement guy, I do marketing…), do it, even if it means another $25-$50 per gun. Realize that reliability in an IPSC match and passing a 2000 round challenge are two different things.
5. Get the word out.
Look, you’re not going to match the marketing budget of the big guys, so get smart about things. Leverage social media and new media like your company’s life depends on it. Make Hickok45 your new best friend. Give away a gun at Gunblogger Rendezvous. Give a CZ75 Compact SDM to Todd Green to test next year: He hates CZ’s, make him eat his words.*
Your goal should be to get people talking about your guns in the context of something other than USPSA/IPSC, but still sponsor at least one stage and/or Division at the World Shoot this year to stay true to your roots.
Realize your competition in the U.S. is Sig, not Glock. Go for the high end, the luxury brand image. Become the BMW to Sig’s Mercedes, because you’re not going to beat Ruger on innovation, Glock on ubiquity, Smith and Wesson on “Not Glock” or any of those three on price. If Taurus can re-shape their image by hiring a top-notch competitor as a spokesperson, re-brand your image as well. Why not hire Travis Haley or Larry Vickers to talk about how so many cops and anti-terrorism teams around the world trust their lives to CZ’s.
* Notice that I held back from saying “And give free guns to bloggers who talk about CZ all the time?” That’s because being more self-restrained was one of this year’s New Year’s Resolutions. But hey, free guns are ALWAYS welcome here!
Want to know what happens when you take a year-long break from practicing with your handgun?
You suck, that’s what happens. I do these kind of tests because you don’t want to.
Trust me on this.
CZ75 Dot Torture Drill: 47 out of 50 (5 Yards)
Yay me. I’m actually pretty happy with that result, but that was the highlight of the day. My runs thru the El Prez were painfully slow, but I made up for it with a lack of accuracy.
|P07 1||P07 2||CZ75 1||CZ75 2||Shield 1||Shield 2|
The only bright spot in that litany of suck and fail is the times I turned in with the Shield, which, if I’m honest, is a mystery to me. I’m guessing it’s because I short-stroked the trigger at least once on each run because of the shift from the shorter reset of the CZ75 to the longer P07 trigger. Might be time to stop riding the trigger and put what I learned from Rob Leatham into practice.
Growing up in Southern Alberta, I was exposed to skiing from a young age, and some of the best moments of my life were on a pair a skis (Well, except for that one time I caught a tip on Norquay…).
I’ve said for a while now that downhill skiing is one of the closest non-gun sport analogy to practical shooting. The scoring can be a bit weird (yes, it’s time-based, but your spot in the race order can dramatically affect your run time) and the difference between first place and fifteenth place can come down to minute adjustments of movement and angles that’s hard for skiers to explain to people outside of the sport.
Science, not intuition is making the difference in skiing right now, and that science-based approach to success hasn’t popped up yet in practical shooting. Why? Because nutritionists and pschologists and precision GPS tracking gear cost MONEY, that’s why. The money and sponsors to pay for such things just isn’t there for practical shooting right now. That’s changing as the cost of such gear gets cheaper and the prize tables at shooting matches get better, but there’s still a gap between what the amount of science needed to win costs and what shooters can pay for.
Someday soon, someone will use science to win a World Shoot, just not now.
I really love my P07 Duty. It’s the gun that I fall back on when other guns let me down. Now that I have a bunch of rounds through it over a few years of shooting, I’m ramping up for a full in-depth review of the gun, but for now, there’s this.
Neat idea, and kudos to the NRA and everyone involved for setting this up.
$200k in prizes: Now we’re talking about a payday that should bring in some attention from all over the sporting world. Let’s hope they work on making the match more friendly for TV than the average shooting match.
I went dove hunting this weekend with Jim from Generations Firearm Training and some other friends.
And by “dove hunting” I mean “I stood on one side of a dairy farm and blasted them as they tried to slip in for a quick meal”. Not much “hunting” involved here, we sat around and talked a lot and each bagged our limit in less than a couple of hours.
Mourning doves aren’t the easiest things in the world to shoot: They fly fast and low to the ground, making them the cruise missiles of the avian world. I managed to get one of mine with a very fast snapshot on a right-to-left mover without really sighting or thinking or considering what I was doing: It was just “Bird!, BLAM! plop”.
Which got me thinking. I reacted quickly, appropriately and effectively to what was happening while I had a gun in my hand.
Isn’t that what we train and compete for?
We spend SO much time in the gun world honing our chosen speciality and forget about how many other fun things are out there. Awhile back, I wrote about what the general skills for a gun owner might be, and as this year winds down and I start to think about next year, those skills are starting to pop up into the front of my mind. To review, they are…
Know the basic operation and use of:
A muzzle-loading black powder rifle
A single action revolver
A double action revolver
A magazine-fed single/double action semiautomatic pistol
A magazine-fed striker-fired semiautomatic pistol
A magazine-fed semiautomatic rifle
A bolt-action rifle
A tube-fed lever-action rifle or shotgun
A tube-fed pump-action shotgun or rifle
A tube-fed semiautomatic shotgun
An over/under or side by side shotgun
Be capable of:
– Field-stripping and cleaning any firearm they own
– Know the basic operation for any firearm they own
– Diagnose common issues with ammunition or operation that might prevent any gun they own from working properly and be able to deal with them correctly
Know how to (but not always accomplish):
– Draw a pistol smoothly and quickly from a holster (maybe from concealment, maybe not)
– Hit center-mass of a man-sized target at least 7 yards away
– Hit a clay pigeon in-flight
– Hit a man-sized target with a modern rifle 300 yards away
Know (and ALWAYS accomplish successfully)
– The Four Rules of Gun Safety
I’m satisfied with my progress with a pistol and improving with my AR’s. It’s time to think about being able to do a bunch of things fairly well instead of one thing very well. I’m also giving a rifle as Christmas present to one of my sons, so it’s time to start thinking about what my legacy will be to my sons versus working on my skills.
Tam’s post last week about her state-of-the-art pistol got me thinkin’. Honestly, if I were going to design an über carry pistol from scratch, I’d end up in about the same place as she did with her M+P.
- 9mm with an extended mag
- Red dot
- Weapon light as an accessory for your daily carry flashlight
You DO carry a flashlight with you, don’t you?
The thing is, unlike the stuff hanging off my AR, most of those accessories on her gun can’t be picked up and put onto my CZ P07. The adaptability that makes an AR-15 so popular hasn’t trickled down to pistols yet.
Is there some kind of standard for interchangeability for pistols coming down the pipe? Who knows? I think there will start to be a demand for such a thing as red dots and lights start to become popular accessories for civilian carry guns. What that standard will be remains to be seen, but if I have to guess (and I do), look for the military to specify a standard for such gizmos and gun manufacturers designing around that.
Yes, people are shooting more competitions and carry concealed more than ever. The new standard of gun ownership is oriented towards the urban gun owner, supplanting and sometimes replacing more rural pursuits like hunting. But you won’t see it if you read the magazines or watch TV. Why?
Well, let’s look at what’s associated with a hunting trip versus, say, shooting a major competitive shooting match. Both (usually) involve a trip of some sort, but what you actually spend your money on is quite different.
To go hunting, you need a truck that’ll handle the back roads, and either a quarter-ton of camping gear or a pre-arranged place to stay. You’ll shoot some ammo (more if it’s birds or some animal where the bag limit is more than one), eat camping food or similar and drive back.
To shoot a match, you fly (or drive) to a hotel, shoot the match using a LOT of ammo (usually stuff you reload yourself), eat at local restaurants or the match-provided caterer and then fly/drive back home.
To go hunting requires a lot of non-hunting expenditures like a truck, camping gear, camouflage clothing and similar items, but not a lot of money spent on the actual “gun activity” (i.e. ammo) when you’re out there. Sure, your rifle or shotgun may cost as much or more as a USPSA race gun, but most of your expenses is stuff that’s not involved with pulling the trigger and is also suitable for outdoor activities like camping or fishing.
Practical shooting? Not so much. Traveling to a match is pretty much like business travel, but with even more hassle from the TSA and Customs. Aside from what you spend at the match itself, the activities required to get you to a match and back are pretty much the same as any other type of travel.
Which makes casting around for ad money for a hunting show is easier than looking for money for a “Gun Culture 2.0″ show, because of all the other outdoor-related industries associated with hunting. Let’s face it, aside from the clothing and gear needed to harvest the food, a fishing trip and a hunting trip look pretty much the same. Making the case that Jeep should sponsor a hunting show is easy, because Jeep products can be used on a hunting trip, the same can be said for Coleman lanterns or RealTree clothing. What type of car is associated with practical shooting? What kind of clothing do USPSA shooters prefer?
Hence the problem.
What’s the solution? Well, finding things on the edges is one way. Practical shooters always wear eye protection where hunters might not. That’s why sponsors like the Rudy Project are important because they make shooting glasses something that normal people buy. Finding things in common is another: Mossberg’s 930 shotgun is a heck of a scattergun for 3 gun AND hunting, and kudos for them for finding ways to advertise the guns to both activities.
And play up the personalities of practical shooting: Yes, Top Shot rode the drama llama hard and often, but that brought in the viewers. How many people follow NASCAR for the love of racing, and how many people follow it to cheer for their heroes and root against their villains.
The future of Gun Culture 2.0 belongs to the people who find a way to make it pay.