Remington announced a trade-in program for owners of the “troubled” R51 pistol.
Anyone who purchased an R51 may return it and receive a new R51 pistol, along with two additional magazines and a custom Pelican case, by calling Remington at (800) 243-9700. You will be asked to provide your name, address, telephone number, and the serial number of your pistol.
There’s been pretty jack and/or squat from Remington about the R51 since that update.I like the R51 because it’s one of the very few semi-auto’s out there that isn’t a blowback action or delayed-action gun, and a little competition improves the gene pool, but you can’t get in the game unless you’re actually in the game. I understand that Remington has gone through some drastic changes since then, but c’mon, throw us a frickin’ bone here.
Thinking more about this throwaway line from Tuesday…
“… has anyone ever taken a serious firearms self-defense class where someone else was using an LCP? Me neither.”
… why is there such a disconnect between the guns we see in a firearms training class and the guns that people actually carry? There’s a bunch of reasons why, of course. I tried to take a Combat Focus Shooting class with my Shield, but in the end, having to have 4+ mags on my belt compared to two needed for the P07 was a deal-breaker. I’ve taken a bunch of “self-defense” firearms classes, and either a) IWB carry is not as popular as the holster manufacturers would have us believe or b) people cheat and use a holster in-class that they’d never use on a daily basis.
That’s like taking a class at Bob Bondurant on how to drive an SUV, when the car in your garage is a Honda Civic.
Part of the blame lies with us, part with the industry, part with trainers. I’ll have more thoughts on this after the weekend.
And yes, the title is a P.I.L. reference.
I’ve been carrying a full-size CZ75 and a spare mag pretty much non-stop for a month now, and I can truly and honestly say they’re as as easy to carry as my subcompact Shield.
The difference? An OWB holster and a good gun belt. I prefer IWB for concealment, but having the gun on the outside of your trousers is a lot easier to live with. My gun belt of choice these days is a Bianchi Fancy Stitched belt in tan, a belt that I use, if I’m honest about it, because it works well AND looks good.
Again with the concerns about an object’s form versus its function.
I am such a poseur.
“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.”
– Matthew 5:43-45, NIV
If nothing else, the horror in Charleston last week should prompt churches into realizing that loving your enemies and relying on God to protect you is a great idea, but relying on God and 124 grain hollowpoints is a better idea. I don’t hate my enemies, but I won’t let them destroy me, either.
If you’re a church leader, and your church does not have a disaster plan, MAKE ONE, for God’s (literal) sake. That plan should cover fire, armed intruders and whatever natural disasters are common to your region: A church in Saskatchewan probably shouldn’t worry about a hurricane, but a blizzard that traps in a congregation overnight is a very real possibility in such climes.
Have a plan. Have a backup plan, and have the means to put those plans into action.
Stuff happens, and the Gospel of Matthew tells us it happens on the righteous and unrighteous in equal amounts. Pray about it, and then deal with it.
I carry a gun in church, and I’ve done so for as long as I could legally carry a gun on my person.
I’ve always understood that churches are a target for the those who wish to do harm to a great number of people at one time, just like people at a movie theater are a target, or a school, or a mall.
Motive, means, and opportunity, and churches represent a big opportunity for people who wish to commit such horrors.
My heart bleeds for my brothers in Christ in South Carolina. I pray for their safety, and for the safety of believers all around the world.
And I also carry a gun in church.
What Would Elmer Keith Do?
I had an interesting discussion with a range officer at work last week: If Elmer Keith and the training legends of the past were alive today, what would they recommend as far as handguns?
One school of thought is that they’d recommend a lot of the same things they recommended back in the day. .44 Magnum. Wheelguns. Wadcutters. More of the same.
Me? I say different.
Let’s digress into the world of photography and talk about St. Ansel of Adams. The question arose awhile back on what ol’ AA would do in today’s world of digital images and photoshop, and I contend that rather than messing around with 8×10 view cameras and spending hours in the darkroom, he’d be diligently working on turning digital photography into a process-driven art, just like he did with chemically-based photography. The Camera, The Negative and The Print were not about the tools themselves, they were about integrating those three items into a process that could deliver consistent, repeatable results.
Now pause for a moment and look at the landscape of defensive firearms and firearms training right after WWII. The 1911 was not a consistently reliable platform yet and bullet design… well, bullet design sucked. Given those two realities, it’s only natural that yesterday’s trainers gravitated to big-bore revolvers, because that’s what worked at that time.
But those times are not our times. Semi-automatics work well now, and high-speed cameras and computer modeling have revolutionized the way bullets are made. Modern pistols work well, modern ammunition stops the threat, and modern materials means you don’t have to lug around an ingot of lead on your hip when you walk out the door.
Bottom line is, if you’re going to have icons, make an icon out of the process, not the person.
Unc asked the question, “What gun for when you leave America?” and a bunch of other people have chimed in with their responses.
Me? I think anything on the California-Approved list should be able to go just about anywhere behind enema lines (NOT a typo), so I’d choose a Ruger LCR in .38+P loaded with Pow’rball and a couple of speedstrips of the same for if I wander into hell and/or New Jersey.
Also, as I really don’t like to travel any great distance without ready access to something bigger than a handgun, I’d back that up with a .38/.357 lever gun with a scout scope, even more Pow’rball and top everything off with a few rounds of snakeshot for zombie carnivorous squirrels and whatnot.
Spotted on the Triangle Tactical Facebook page:
In a word, yes.
How many decisions about our cars/motorcycles are made on the basis of how they look, not how they actually perform? How many clothing decisions are made the same way as well? If guns are going to be part of our everyday lives, that means they’re going to be subject to same kinds of decision inputs we use for everything else.
Talk about a complete and utter failure in the victim selection process…
A doctor was leaving home to compete in a shooting competition held at Magnolia Pistol Range in Byram at approximately 7:45 AM today. He made several trips from the house to his truck carrying what he needed for the competition. Unknown to him, two black males were cruising Ridgewood Road looking for someone to rob. They happened upon him walking to his truck near the intestection Ridgewood and Eastover roads. They took him captive at gunpoint and forced him drive to an ATM and withdraw a large amount of money
They stopped at Eastover and Pinewood. They told him to get out of the vehicle. The good Doc managed to grab a pistol as he exited the truck and began firing. He shot and killed an Edwin Robinson of Cooper Road. One person at the scene said “he shot the sh!t out of him”.
Huh. Musta been shooting Open…